Q2(a) - The candidate was awarded 6 marks because there are six valid points linking aspects of ergonomics to parts and uses of the bicycle.
e.g.
All of these responses are correct and a further 3 marks are given.
Q2(b) (i) - The candidate was awarded 1 mark because ‘different terrains’ is a correct response.
Q2(b) (ii) - The candidate was awarded 1 mark because the ‘chain must be able to be cleaned or fixed’ is a correct response.
Q2(b) (iii) - The candidate was awarded 1 mark because it states ‘it is more likely people will buy the bikes if they look nice’.
Q2(a) - The candidate was awarded 2 marks because simply listing bicycle parts is an issue here, however when the response is read holistically there is enough for 2 marks.
Q2(b) (i) - The candidate was awarded 1 mark because ‘find out what the best materials’ are is a correct response.
Q2(b) (ii) - The candidate was awarded 1 mark because ‘easy to clean’ is a correct response.
Q2(b) (iii) - The candidate was awarded 1 mark because finding out the ‘best colours and themes for each gender’ is a correct response.
Q2(a) - The candidate was awarded 5 marks because the list method used is clearly giving 5 correct responses. e.g.
The first response is not correct as it does not link the pedals to any body part.
Q2(b) (i) - The candidate was awarded 1 mark because the issue of the bike lasting long is correct.
Q2(b) (ii) - The candidate was awarded 1 mark because the issue of people not being able to look after it with ease is correct.
Q2(b) (iii) - The candidate was awarded 1 mark because’ if it looks good’ people will want to get it is correct.