Skip to content Skip to main navigation Skip to sub navigation Skip to Accessibility Page
Main navigation:
Breadcrumb navigation:
Sub navigation:

In this section

Candidate 3

Brief 1: Produce a background report on an individual who will be using care services for the first time

Question 1(a) Action Plan

The candidate was awarded 5 marks because the description of the chosen individual was clear with more than 4 relevant points of explanation. Full answer.


Question 1(b)

The candidate was awarded 2 marks because each stage was given a timeline with a short breakdown detailed.


Question 1(c)

The candidate was awarded 3 marks as each chosen source gave an accurate point of explanation linking to the issues described in 1(a) and the individual. Each source of information was referenced.


Question 2(a) Responding to the brief

The candidate was awarded 12 marks because each of the 4 needs were accurately described, relevant to the individual and clearly explained.


Question 2(b)

The candidate was awarded 12 marks as they gave an excellent explanation of how each psychological theory would apply to the individual.
Berne full 6 marks
Bandura full 6 marks


Question 2(c)

The candidate was awarded 12 marks because each sociological concept was accurately described. Each of the 3 concepts spoke about the direct impact on the individual.


Question 2(d)

The candidate was awarded 12 marks because in each of the care services selected, the positive care environment was described and linked to the needs of the individual.


Question 2(e)

The candidate was awarded 12 marks because with each of the features in the psychological theory they fully explained how the care worker could demonstrate positive care practice. This directly related to the need of their chosen individual.


Question 2(f)

The candidate was awarded 4 marks because they gave good and extensive list of 2 sources of information they used.
Books 2
Web search 2


Question 2(g)

The candidate was awarded 4 marks because the 3 stages were appropriately structured, well organised and presentation was very good.


Question 3(a) Evaluation

The candidate was awarded 10 marks because they evaluated accurately five points of what they thought worked well or not. They referred to their plan and log throughout.


Question 3(b)

The candidate was awarded 2 marks because although they gave 3 examples of how they could improve they did not refer to plan or log book.


Question 3(c)

The candidate was awarded 2 marks because they gave a basic answer on how they could use what they have gained from working on the project.