Examiner marks:
Mark: 8 / 8
Examiner Comments:
The candidate was awarded 8 marks because……
The candidate opens by identifying evidence which is not selective.
2 marks were awarded for using evidence from Source 1 and Source 3 about the victim surcharge.
Source 2 and Source 3 were used to demonstrate that victims were happy with the services provided, using pie chart evidence [3 marks].
The response clearly marks a change to addressing where Oliver is selective, identifying low funding [1], S1 £50 000 is not enough [1] and ‘not able to give full training [1].
Total mark = 8/8.