We're working on a new website. You'll see references to both Qualifications Scotland and SQA while we complete this work. Learn more.
Skip to content Skip to main navigation Skip to sub navigation Skip to Accessibility Page
Main navigation:
Breadcrumb navigation:
Sub navigation:

In this section

Triangulation

Rather than producing multiple examples of the same evidence types to prove competence (i.e. three Observations covering the same PIs) it is far better to produce a variety of evidence using different instruments of assessment. This is much more efficient and can be accomplished by using both Performance Evidence and Supporting Evidence. For example using Observation [►Observation ] and Work Product [►Work Product ] (Performance Evidence) supported by Witness Testimony [►Witness Testimony ] (Supporting Evidence). These three types of evidence together are a good example of Triangulation.

Triangulation is also a good way of demonstrating competence over time where the different types of evidence are gathered over a certain period. Witness Testimony is particularly useful to support Performance Evidence over the relevant timeframe as it is not simply a snapshot in time of when the assessment event took place i.e. “This is the level of performance demonstrated consistently by X in his/her role on a regular basis”.

The following are examples of good Triangulation resulting in a balance of evidence, clearly and robustly demonstrating competence over time:

S220 Use Office Equipment

Performance Evidence

Supporting Evidence

Tracking

Not every piece of evidence from the portfolio has been included here, but the examples provided illustrate a good balance of evidence types and the Performance and Knowledge Tracking Sheets show the range of PIs and K&U that can be covered by good Triangulation.

S209 Handle Mail

Performance Evidence

Supporting Evidence

Tracking

Again, not every piece of evidence from the portfolio has been included, but a good balance of evidence types and the Performance and Knowledge Tracking Sheets and range of coverage is shown. Note that 6 of the 8 K&U are covered through Performance Evidence and Storyboard, therefore only two supplementary questions are needed to fill the gaps in Knowledge.