Examiner marks:
Mark: 11 / 15
Examiner Comments:
Question 1(a)(i) – the candidate was awarded 2/2 marks, one for stating the training she had and one for managing a salon. The candidate wrote a wordy answer for an identify question and may have lost some time.
Question 1(a)(ii) – the candidate was awarded 0/2 as they have not outlined how the skills and qualities will help her succeed in the business
Question 1(b) – the candidate was awarded 1/2 marks as they have made one comparison, they have not attempted a second comparison. Candidate has not made a direct comparison but 2 sides have been matched up (A).
Question 1(c) – the candidate was awarded 1/2 marks. The justification awarded is ‘because it makes the customers want to return.’ There is no second justification.
Question 1(d)(i) – the candidate was awarded 3/3 marks because they have outlined 3 stages in the recruitment process.
Question 1(d)(ii) – the candidate was awarded 2/2 marks. They have correctly described how individuals should be treated and outlined the protected characteristics.
Question 1(e)(i) – the candidate was awarded 1/1 mark for the identification.
Question 1(e)(ii) – the candidate was awarded 1/1 mark for the description of the product life cycle stage.
